https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=forums&srcid=MDE0MTU1NTM0NzU2NjM2NDg4NDcBMDI1MzUyNTMxMzA3MTIxNTUwNzABZzhNdXNvemdkU2NKATQBAXYy
ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9732/2012
(From the judgement and order dated 28/04/2011 in WP No.177/2011 of the
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SACHIN SHANKAR DIVKAR & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With office report))
Date: 24/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. B.H. Marlapalle,Sr.Adv.
Ms. Asha G. Nair,Adv.
Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. S.G. Kudle,Adv.
Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv.
Mr. Yadunandan Bansal,Adv.
Mr. Manish Pitale,Adv.
Mr. Wasi Haider,Adv.
Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv.
Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv.
Mr. B.S. Sai,Adv.
Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv.
Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Marlapalle, learned senior counsel in support of
this special leave petition and Mr. Kudle and Mr. Manish Pitale,
learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The special leave
petition seeks to challenge the common order passed by a Division
Bench of the Bombay High Court in a number of writ petitions allowing
those writ petitions on the basis of the judgment rendered earlier by
another Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Petition No.4424 of
2003. The issue involved is with respect to the pay-scales of the
Librarians. The earlier judgment of the High Court passed in Writ
Petition No.4424 of 2003 was left undisturbed by this Court. The High
Court could not have taken a different view. We are also not inclined
to take a different view on merits. The special leave petition is,
therefore, dismissed.
(A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
A.R.-CUM-P.S. COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9732/2012
(From the judgement and order dated 28/04/2011 in WP No.177/2011 of the
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SACHIN SHANKAR DIVKAR & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With office report))
Date: 24/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. B.H. Marlapalle,Sr.Adv.
Ms. Asha G. Nair,Adv.
Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. S.G. Kudle,Adv.
Mr. Rauf Rahim,Adv.
Mr. Yadunandan Bansal,Adv.
Mr. Manish Pitale,Adv.
Mr. Wasi Haider,Adv.
Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv.
Mr. Nitin S. Tambwekar,Adv.
Mr. B.S. Sai,Adv.
Mr. K. Rajeev,Adv.
Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Marlapalle, learned senior counsel in support of
this special leave petition and Mr. Kudle and Mr. Manish Pitale,
learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The special leave
petition seeks to challenge the common order passed by a Division
Bench of the Bombay High Court in a number of writ petitions allowing
those writ petitions on the basis of the judgment rendered earlier by
another Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Petition No.4424 of
2003. The issue involved is with respect to the pay-scales of the
Librarians. The earlier judgment of the High Court passed in Writ
Petition No.4424 of 2003 was left undisturbed by this Court. The High
Court could not have taken a different view. We are also not inclined
to take a different view on merits. The special leave petition is,
therefore, dismissed.
(A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)
A.R.-CUM-P.S. COURT MASTER
No comments:
Post a Comment